Accessibility is often presented as a compliance checkbox. A legal requirement. A nice-to-have. But this framing misses something crucial: accessible design doesn’t exclude people. It makes things better for everyone.
Consider captions on video. They were born from the need to serve deaf users. Today, they’re ubiquitous because restaurants without sound, students in noisy dorms, and people watching in crowded spaces all benefit. The accessible feature became the default.
Or voice controls. Developed partly for accessibility, they’re now how millions navigate their devices while driving or cooking. Ramps built for wheelchair users turned out to be invaluable for anyone pushing a stroller, rolling luggage, or just struggling with stairs as they age.
Accessibility requirements aren’t constraints on your design. They’re guidelines toward better design. When you design for a screen reader user, you’re forced to create clear hierarchies and logical content structures. Everyone benefits from clarity. When you design for low-vision users, you establish sufficient color contrast. Everyone benefits from readability.
The disability lens reveals what’s broken in your interface for anyone. The elderly trying to use your app with aging eyes. The parent juggling a baby and a coffee with one free hand. The person in bright sunlight trying to read your tiny gray text. These aren’t edge cases. They’re just being human.
There’s also something else: accessibility often reveals where designers have gotten lazy. If your button is small and unlabeled, it works fine for most—until someone needs a keyboard or a screen reader. Suddenly your design debt becomes visible.
Start thinking about accessibility not as a burden but as a design challenge. How do you convey hierarchy without color alone? How do you make complex interactions work with just keyboard input? How do you write alt text that actually helps? These constraints produce better thinking.
The best products are the ones that work for everyone. Accessibility isn’t about being nice. It’s about building things that don’t break when used in different ways, at different angles, by different people facing different constraints. That’s not charity. That’s just good design.